• Home
  • What is Critical Religion?
  • Events
    • December 2015: Translating Christianities Colloquium
    • August 2015: Religion at Stirling under threat
    • September 2015: Aberdeen conference
    • October 2014: Education or indoctrination: the future role of religion in Scotland’s schools
    • May 2014: (Mis-)Representing Cultures and Objects
    • May 2014: Critical Approaches to the Study of Religion
    • December 2013: Conference: Maurice Blanchot and the Specters of Romanticism
    • October 2012 ‘A Scottish Hotel in the Holy Land’ Michael Marten on BBC radio
    • August 2012 ‘What is the point of… universities?’ Andrew Hass on BBC radio
    • August 2012 Disorganised Religion – a Conversation
    • April 2012 Naomi Goldenberg visit
    • April 2012 Dr Seija Jalagin
    • March 2011 postgraduate conference
  • Scholars
  • Links
  • Blog
    • Ekklesia
  • Recordings
    • Naomi Goldenberg
  • Updates
  • Organisation
  • Contact

The Critical Religion Association

~ Critical Approaches to the Study of Religion

The Critical Religion Association

Tag Archives: GCSE

Comment on the high court challenge to the new Religious Studies GCSE curriculum in England

16 Monday Nov 2015

Posted by Alison Jasper in Critical Religion, University of Stirling

≈ Comments Off on Comment on the high court challenge to the new Religious Studies GCSE curriculum in England

Tags

education, GCSE, humanism, religious studies, schools

The Education Acts in England and Scotland (1945 & 1946) established that all children and young people at school should take ‘religious education’ and begin each day with some kind of act of ‘religious observance’.  Although the Acts are now sometimes observed ‘more in the breach’ – anecdotal evidence suggests –   this is still the case officially across the UK today.

There has always been a minority view since 1945 that ‘religion’ is not an appropriate subject to study at school in a ‘secular’ age. More recently however the content of RE curricula has changed in response to concerns about its ‘confessional’ character and people are accustomed to the idea that the content of RE now relates to a neutral treatment of ‘world religions’ rather than to the inculcation of a particular set of teachings, beliefs or practices.  Now another point of contention seems to have emerged. A group composed of parents and young people supported by the British Humanist Association (BHA) is going to court to challenge the government’s most recent revised curriculum for Religious Studies in England and Wales at GCSE level.

One argument appears to be that such a limited description of ‘world religions’  (typically in recent years only six recognized ‘major world religions’ are studied in the UK context) gives the impression that within the school curriculum, issues of truth and morality are predominantly if not exclusively addressed here and that ‘non-religious world views’ are somehow discriminated against as inferior. This view is understandable given the ways in which we use the terms ‘religion’, ‘non-religious’ and ‘the secular’ and this is something that a group of scholars associated with the term ‘critical religion’ have been working on in recent years. They have come up with the idea that this language does not simply describe several equitable positions or entities existing in the world that – as seems to be the demand in this case – should all have their place in terms of educational policy making and the curriculum. Tim Fitzgerald of Stirling University has argued for example that

‘…religion is a power category that, in dialectical interplay with other power categories such as ‘politics’, ‘science’ or ‘nature’, constructs a world and our own apprehensions according to the interests of private property, and the various beliefs, institutions and practices that have come into the world to protect private property.’

The BHA and the parents and young people they are supporting in this case may thus  be justified in their concern about the associations of ‘religion’ with notions of truth, conscience and morality that are arguably still significantly informed in policy contexts  by a privileged view of its meaning as explored by Fitzgerald for example.  By excluding humanism from the context of ‘religion’ in the curriculum, the BHA might quite reasonably argue they are thus  being excluded from a point of privileged moral and ethical reference in British society. At the same time, we could  say that the terms ‘religion’ and ‘the religious’ continue to act in British society to describe a sphere of influence that is subordinate.  Its proper concerns are determined by their distinction from ‘the secular’ within an essentially hierarchical binary. The sphere of ‘religion’ is viewed as contributing to a legitimate if subsidiary and largely privatized social and cultural richness or diversity, but there is little doubt in the present ideological context within British society that power in the public realm lies with values and institutions that are generally identified as ‘secular.’

In consequence the appellants seem at once justified and unjustified in their case.  Humanism does seem as worthy of study as, for example, Christianity or any other of the ‘six major religions’.  On the other hand, it is difficult to know what is to be achieved by trying to establish humanism as an equivalent to the other ‘world religions’ or even in terms of the synonymous  ‘world view’ whilst the RE curriculum continues systematically to exclude any discussion of the fascinating and not very neutral, normative concerns of contemporary society currently elevated in contrast as ‘secular’.

In other words whilst there seems to be an issue here about discrimination and the equitable recognition of diversity, there is perhaps an even more profound issue about the entire discursive language of religion/non-religion/secularity that in policy terms has already powerfully limited the possible differences of truth, conscience and morality with which young people can be encouraged to engage in school RE curricula, revised or otherwise.

Recent blog postings:

  • Call for Papers: “Religion as a Changing Category of Muslim Practice” 22 February 2019
  • Critical Muslims 28 November 2018
  • A Response to ZG: 1 February 2018
  • Timothy Fitzgerald Abolishing Politics – A response 18 October 2017
  • Timothy Fitzgerald, Abolishing Politics, Foreword, pp. 1-16 10 June 2017

Frequent blog tags:

academia Africa art Bible Biblical criticism body Buddhist capitalism categories Christian church clash of civilisations concept of zero crisis Critical Religion culture economics economic theory education epistemology female genius feminism freedom of religion gender global higher education Hindu Hinduism humanities impact India interdisciplinarity interfaith dialogue international relations Islam Israel Japan Jew law liberal education managerialism Middle East mission history music Muslim Naomi Goldenberg negation Northern Ireland nothing Palestine patriarchy performance politics postcolonial power REF religion religion-secular binary religious education religious freedom religious observance religious studies ritual sacred schools Scotland secular spiritualities stained glass theology United Kingdom university University of Stirling vestigial states women

Follow us on Twitter

  • RT @Ekklesia_co_uk: Due to demand, we've released some more tickets for Tues 28th. DON"T MISS OUT. Please BOOK NOW! eventbrite.co.uk/e/transforming…… 1 year ago
  • RT @TeemuTaira: Response to my interview by Paul Hedges (link) and my response (screen shot from Facebook) religiousstudiesproject.com/2016/09/22/the… https://… 2 years ago
  • RT @DrRNadadur: This ( religiousstudiesproject.com/2016/09/22/the…) is very good & addresses the points I have made in a blog post for @CriticoReligio https://t… 2 years ago
Follow @CriticoReligio

‘Like’ us on Facebook

‘Like’ us on Facebook

Our blog is published in association with

Ekklesia

Top Posts & Pages

  • Timothy Fitzgerald, Abolishing Politics, Foreword, pp. 1-16
  • What is Critical Religion?
  • Events
  • Home
  • Fitzgerald, Timothy
  • Performative prayer and 'comparing' religion
  • The O of Giotto
  • Performing Gender and Sexuality in Early 20th Century India
  • Education or indoctrination: the future role of religion in Scotland’s schools - a student view
  • Scholars

The Critical Religion Association…

... an international scholarly association pioneering intellectual engagement with questions on 'religion' and related categories.

About this site

This site is mostly maintained by Dr R Nadadur Kannan. Please contact us with any queries.
You can keep in touch with our work on Twitter, on Facebook, and through our mailing list.

About the blog

The Critical Religion blog is a shared (multi-author) blog.
The views represented are the personal views of individual authors and do not represent the position of the Critical Religion Association on any particular issue.

Copyright and Funding

Please note that all text and images on this site is protected by copyright law. Blog postings and profile texts are the copyright of their respective authors. We warmly welcome links to our site: each page/blog entry includes a variety of convenient sharing tools to help with this. For more information, see the note at the bottom of this page. Please do not reproduce texts in emails or on your own site unless you have express written permission to do so (if in doubt, please contact us). Thank you.

For a note about funding, see the information at the bottom of this page.

The CRA and the CRRG

The Critical Religion Association (this website) emerged from the work of the University of Stirling's Critical Religion Research Group created in early 2011. Interest in the CRRG grew beyond all expectations, and the staff at Stirling sought to address requests for involvement beyond Stirling by creating the CRA as an international scholarly association in November 2012. The CRRG passed on the blog and other key content to the CRA, and this is being developed here.
The CRRG website is now devoted exclusively to the scholarly work of the staff at the University of Stirling.

Critical Religion online

Apart from this website, the Critical Religion Research Group also has accounts elsewhere online:
- we are on Twitter;
- we are on Facebook;
- we have audio on Audioboo;
We will soon also offer video.

RSS feeds

  • RSS - Posts
  • RSS - Comments

Administration

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.com

Blog at WordPress.com.