• Home
  • What is Critical Religion?
  • Events
    • December 2015: Translating Christianities Colloquium
    • August 2015: Religion at Stirling under threat
    • September 2015: Aberdeen conference
    • October 2014: Education or indoctrination: the future role of religion in Scotland’s schools
    • May 2014: (Mis-)Representing Cultures and Objects
    • May 2014: Critical Approaches to the Study of Religion
    • December 2013: Conference: Maurice Blanchot and the Specters of Romanticism
    • October 2012 ‘A Scottish Hotel in the Holy Land’ Michael Marten on BBC radio
    • August 2012 ‘What is the point of… universities?’ Andrew Hass on BBC radio
    • August 2012 Disorganised Religion – a Conversation
    • April 2012 Naomi Goldenberg visit
    • April 2012 Dr Seija Jalagin
    • March 2011 postgraduate conference
  • Scholars
  • Links
  • Blog
    • Ekklesia
  • Recordings
    • Naomi Goldenberg
  • Updates
  • Organisation
  • Contact

The Critical Religion Association

~ Critical Approaches to the Study of Religion

The Critical Religion Association

Tag Archives: power relations

Postmodernism, postcolonialism, and the private property society

27 Thursday Aug 2015

Posted by Timothy Fitzgerald in Critical Religion, University of Stirling

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

capitalism, Critical Religion, power relations, private property

‘Religion’ is part of a classification system that appears to the secular liberal as neutral, given unproblematically in consciousness as corresponding to how the world is, independent of the discursive formations that constitute our collective inter-subjective apprehensions. Yet on the contrary, classification systems embody power relations. Critical religion proposes that religion is a power category that, in dialectical interplay with other power categories such as ‘politics’, ‘science’ or ‘nature’, constructs a world and our own apprehensions according to the interests of private property, and the various beliefs, institutions and practices that have come into the world to protect private property.

The right to the outright private ownership of the earth, including the right to buy and sell for purely personal gain, unencumbered by any effects the practice might have on the lives of other people or the environment, is a historically peculiar idea, one which would have been incomprehensible to most of the peoples who ever existed. And yet this masculinist fiction of the naturally possessive individual and his supposed rights of private ownership – rights for which women had to struggle for centuries to achieve for themselves – has been transformed into our dominant notion of ‘human nature’, and has become the globalising norm of the world order.

The category religion has a unique function in the way it enables the mythical basis of private ownership of the earth, and makes it seem normal and inevitable. The right to unlimited private accumulation of our common organic inheritance, regardless of the effect on the rest, is the default position of liberal and neoliberal capitalism. In putative contrast to the blind faith of ‘believers’, private ownership of the earth is celebrated by generations of secular liberals as an enlightened discovery, a sign of a higher stage of progress and development, our collective arrival at mature knowledge of ‘reality’, including what it means to be human.

Critical religion is a revolutionary practice that seeks to subvert the rhetorical illusions that transform a peculiar way of owning the earth into common sense normality, as though there is an inherent inevitability – betrayed by such common expressions as “that’s the way the world is”, “you can’t change human nature”, or “stuff happens” – that the land, the air, the water, the energy, and even the genes of our collective organic inheritance can be privately owned and privately profited from, with minimal if any responsibility for impact on the remainder.

It follows from this position that there cannot be a genuine postmodern or postcolonial consciousness at least until the modern liberal categories of the understanding have been critically deconstructed and the illusion that they are neutral and objective has been dispelled. To be postmodern and postcolonial is to be post the categories of secular liberal understanding. We are not there yet.

To faithfully pursue this process brings one up against the inflexible resistance of the liberal or neoliberal university and its structures and priorities. This critical challenge to the dominant norms does not win one many friends. The liberal universities within which we work reflect and reproduce these ideological priorities. This is a good reason why liberal academics cannot effectively stand up against the neoliberal transformation of universities into business corporations with top-down, anti-democratic managerial structures, and an obsessive reduction of all values to market commodities.

Recent blog postings:

  • A Response to ZG: 1 February 2018
  • Timothy Fitzgerald Abolishing Politics – A response 18 October 2017
  • Timothy Fitzgerald, Abolishing Politics, Foreword, pp. 1-16 10 June 2017
  • Hermeneutic Elements in the Methodology of Shi‘i Ijtihad: A Talk by Jafar Morvarid 30 March 2017
  • Postcolonial and Subaltern Rethinking of Critical Religion 17 September 2016

Frequent blog tags:

academia Africa art Bible Biblical criticism body Buddhist capitalism categories Christian church clash of civilisations concept of zero crisis Critical Religion culture economics economic theory education epistemology female genius feminism freedom of religion gender global higher education Hindu Hinduism humanities impact India interdisciplinarity interfaith dialogue international relations Islam Israel Japan Jew law liberal education managerialism Middle East mission history music Muslim Naomi Goldenberg negation Northern Ireland nothing Palestine patriarchy performance politics postcolonial power REF religion religion-secular binary religious education religious freedom religious observance religious studies ritual sacred schools Scotland secular spiritualities stained glass theology United Kingdom university University of Stirling vestigial states women

Follow us on Twitter

  • RT @Ekklesia_co_uk: Due to demand, we've released some more tickets for Tues 28th. DON"T MISS OUT. Please BOOK NOW! eventbrite.co.uk/e/transforming…… 1 year ago
  • RT @TeemuTaira: Response to my interview by Paul Hedges (link) and my response (screen shot from Facebook) religiousstudiesproject.com/2016/09/22/the… https://… 1 year ago
  • RT @DrRNadadur: This ( religiousstudiesproject.com/2016/09/22/the…) is very good & addresses the points I have made in a blog post for @CriticoReligio https://t… 1 year ago
Follow @CriticoReligio

‘Like’ us on Facebook

‘Like’ us on Facebook

Our blog is published in association with

Ekklesia

Top Posts & Pages

  • Scholars
  • What is Critical Religion?
  • Home
  • Rethinking Secularism (Again)
  • Cyborgs or Goddesses? Donna Haraway, Human Resources Management and the coming of the Performative Absolute
  • The O of Giotto
  • Tibetan self-immolation between religious practice and political statement
  • The Discourse on Good and Bad ‘Secularism’ in France

The Critical Religion Association…

... an international scholarly association pioneering intellectual engagement with questions on 'religion' and related categories.

About this site

This site is mostly maintained by Dr R Nadadur Kannan. Please contact us with any queries.
You can keep in touch with our work on Twitter, on Facebook, and through our mailing list.

About the blog

The Critical Religion blog is a shared (multi-author) blog.
The views represented are the personal views of individual authors and do not represent the position of the Critical Religion Association on any particular issue.

Copyright and Funding

Please note that all text and images on this site is protected by copyright law. Blog postings and profile texts are the copyright of their respective authors. We warmly welcome links to our site: each page/blog entry includes a variety of convenient sharing tools to help with this. For more information, see the note at the bottom of this page. Please do not reproduce texts in emails or on your own site unless you have express written permission to do so (if in doubt, please contact us). Thank you.

For a note about funding, see the information at the bottom of this page.

The CRA and the CRRG

The Critical Religion Association (this website) emerged from the work of the University of Stirling's Critical Religion Research Group created in early 2011. Interest in the CRRG grew beyond all expectations, and the staff at Stirling sought to address requests for involvement beyond Stirling by creating the CRA as an international scholarly association in November 2012. The CRRG passed on the blog and other key content to the CRA, and this is being developed here.
The CRRG website is now devoted exclusively to the scholarly work of the staff at the University of Stirling.

Critical Religion online

Apart from this website, the Critical Religion Research Group also has accounts elsewhere online:
- we are on Twitter;
- we are on Facebook;
- we have audio on Audioboo;
We will soon also offer video.

RSS feeds

  • RSS - Posts
  • RSS - Comments

Administration

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.com

Blog at WordPress.com.